Select Language

Maximal Coin-Position Entanglement in Quantum Walks

Study of maximal coin-position entanglement generation in discrete-time quantum walks using optimized coin sequences, with experimental validation and applications in quantum information processing.
computetoken.net | PDF Size: 4.1 MB
Rating: 4.5/5
Your Rating
You have already rated this document
PDF Document Cover - Maximal Coin-Position Entanglement in Quantum Walks

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

Quantum walks (QWs) represent the quantum analogue of classical random walks and have emerged as fundamental tools in quantum information science. Unlike their classical counterparts, quantum walks exploit superposition and entanglement to achieve exponential speedups in various computational tasks. This study focuses on discrete-time quantum walks (DTQWs) and specifically addresses the challenge of generating maximal coin-position entanglement regardless of initial conditions.

The key innovation presented here is the development of optimized coin sequences that guarantee maximal entanglement generation for any step beyond the second, overcoming previous limitations that required either specific initial states or asymptotic approaches. This work bridges theoretical optimization with experimental validation using linear optics.

2. Methodology

2.1 Quantum Walk Framework

The discrete-time quantum walk operates in a Hilbert space $\\mathcal{H} = \\mathcal{H}_c \\otimes \\mathcal{H}_p$, where $\\mathcal{H}_c$ is the coin space (typically 2-dimensional) and $\\mathcal{H}_p$ is the position space. The evolution at each step is governed by the unitary operator $\\hat{U} = \\hat{S}(\\hat{C} \\otimes \\hat{I})$, where $\\hat{S}$ is the shift operator and $\\hat{C}$ is the coin operator.

2.2 Coin Operation Sequences

We employ a strategy where the coin operation at each step is randomly selected from a set of two operators: the Hadamard gate $\\hat{H}$ and the identity gate $\\hat{I}$. This sequence is equivalent to the generalized elephant quantum walk and enables robust entanglement generation independent of the initial coin state.

3. Technical Implementation

3.1 Mathematical Formulation

The general SU(2) coin operator is parameterized as:

$$\\hat{C}(\\xi, \\gamma, \\zeta) = \\begin{pmatrix} e^{i\\xi}\\cos\\gamma & e^{i\\zeta}\\sin\\gamma \\\\ e^{-i\\zeta}\\sin\\gamma & -e^{-i\\xi}\\cos\\gamma \\end{pmatrix}, \\quad \\gamma, \\xi, \\zeta \\in [0, 2\\pi]$$

For maximal entanglement generation, we specifically use the Hadamard operator $\\hat{H} = \\frac{1}{\\sqrt{2}}\\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 \\\\ 1 & -1 \\end{pmatrix}$ and identity operator $\\hat{I} = \\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\\\ 0 & 1 \\end{pmatrix}$ in optimized sequences.

3.2 Optimization Approach

Maximal entanglement generation is formulated as an optimization problem with quantum process fidelity as the cost function. The optimization identifies coin sequences that maximize entanglement for any step number $T \\geq 3$, achieving results that are independent of the initial state preparation.

4. Experimental Results

4.1 Linear Optics Implementation

We experimentally demonstrated a ten-step quantum walk using linear optics. The setup employed waveplates and beam displacers to implement the coin operations and shift operations, with single photons serving as walkers. The experimental configuration enabled precise control over the coin sequence and accurate measurement of the resulting entanglement.

4.2 Entanglement Measurement

The generated entanglement was quantified using concurrence and entropy measures. For the ten-step walk with optimized coin sequences, we observed near-maximal entanglement values exceeding 0.98 for all tested initial states. The probability distribution showed the characteristic faster spreading associated with the generalized elephant quantum walk.

Entanglement Achievement

> 0.98

Concurrence for 10-step walk

Step Independence

T ≥ 3

Works for all steps beyond second

Initial State Independence

100%

Works for arbitrary initial states

5. Analysis & Discussion

This research represents a significant advancement in quantum walk-based entanglement generation, addressing two critical limitations of previous approaches: step-number dependence and initial-state sensitivity. The optimization framework developed here treats maximal entanglement generation as a quantum process fidelity optimization problem, yielding coin sequences that guarantee high entanglement for any step beyond the second.

Compared to earlier work on disordered quantum walks that achieved asymptotic entanglement generation, our approach provides practical, finite-step solutions that are immediately applicable in experimental settings. The equivalence between our optimized coin sequences and the generalized elephant quantum walk reveals an interesting connection between entanglement generation and transport properties, particularly the observed faster spreading in position space.

The experimental validation using linear optics demonstrates the feasibility of implementing these optimized sequences with current quantum technologies. As noted in the comprehensive review of quantum walks by Venegas-Andraca (2012), the ability to generate high-dimensional entanglement reliably is crucial for advancing quantum communication protocols. Our work aligns with the broader trend in quantum information science toward developing robust, initial-state-independent protocols, similar to advancements in quantum error correction and fault-tolerant quantum computing.

From a technical perspective, the use of Hadamard and identity operations in the optimal sequences is particularly noteworthy. This simplicity enhances experimental feasibility while maintaining theoretical performance, reminiscent of the minimalist approach seen in seminal works like the CycleGAN paper (Zhu et al., 2017), where simple architectural choices yielded powerful results. The mathematical formulation using SU(2) parameterization provides a comprehensive framework that could be extended to more complex coin operations in future work.

The implications of this research extend beyond fundamental quantum mechanics to practical quantum technologies. As quantum computing platforms mature, the ability to generate high-dimensional entangled states reliably becomes increasingly important for quantum networking, distributed quantum computation, and quantum-enhanced sensing. Our approach provides a systematic method for achieving this goal using quantum walks, which are naturally implementable on various quantum hardware platforms including photonic systems, trapped ions, and superconducting qubits.

6. Code Implementation

Below is a Python pseudocode example demonstrating the quantum walk simulation with optimized coin sequences:

import numpy as np
from qutip import basis, tensor, sigmax, qeye

def hadamard():
    return 1/np.sqrt(2) * np.array([[1, 1], [1, -1]])

def identity():
    return np.array([[1, 0], [0, 1]])

def shift_operator(position_space):
    # Create shift operator that moves |0> to right, |1> to left
    S_pos = np.zeros((position_space, position_space))
    for i in range(position_space-1):
        S_pos[i+1, i] = 1  # Shift right
        S_pos[i, i+1] = 1  # Shift left
    return S_pos

def quantum_walk_step(psi, coin_op, shift_op, position_dim):
    # Apply coin operation
    coin_full = np.kron(coin_op, np.eye(position_dim))
    psi_after_coin = coin_full @ psi
    
    # Apply shift operation
    shift_full = np.kron(np.eye(2), shift_op)
    psi_after_shift = shift_full @ psi_after_coin
    
    return psi_after_shift

def calculate_entanglement(state, coin_dim, position_dim):
    # Calculate entanglement entropy
    density_matrix = np.outer(state, state.conj())
    reduced_density = partial_trace(density_matrix, [coin_dim, position_dim])
    eigenvalues = np.linalg.eigvalsh(reduced_density)
    entropy = -np.sum(eigenvalues * np.log2(eigenvalues + 1e-12))
    return entropy

# Example: 10-step walk with optimal coin sequence
coin_sequence = [hadamard(), identity(), hadamard(), identity(), 
                 hadamard(), identity(), hadamard(), identity(),
                 hadamard(), identity()]

# Initialize quantum state
initial_coin = 1/np.sqrt(2) * np.array([1, 1])  # |+> state
initial_position = basis(21, 10)  # Start at center
psi = np.kron(initial_coin, initial_position)

position_dim = 21
shift_op = shift_operator(position_dim)

# Execute quantum walk
entanglement_values = []
for step, coin_op in enumerate(coin_sequence):
    psi = quantum_walk_step(psi, coin_op, shift_op, position_dim)
    entropy = calculate_entanglement(psi, 2, position_dim)
    entanglement_values.append(entropy)
    print(f"Step {step+1}: Entanglement entropy = {entropy:.4f}")

7. Future Applications

The ability to generate maximal coin-position entanglement reliably has numerous potential applications:

  • Quantum Communication: High-dimensional entangled states can enhance channel capacity in quantum key distribution protocols.
  • Quantum Computing: Quantum walks serve as universal computational models, and reliable entanglement generation is crucial for complex quantum algorithms.
  • The optimized sequences could simulate complex quantum systems with enhanced entanglement properties.
  • Quantum Metrology: Entangled states enable precision measurements beyond classical limits, with applications in sensing and imaging.
  • Quantum Networks: The initial-state independence makes these protocols robust for distributed quantum information processing.

Future research directions include extending this approach to higher-dimensional coin spaces, investigating multi-walker scenarios, and exploring applications in topological quantum computing and quantum machine learning.

8. References

  1. Venegas-Andraca, S. E. (2012). Quantum walks: a comprehensive review. Quantum Information Processing, 11(5), 1015-1106.
  2. Kitagawa, T., et al. (2010). Exploring topological phases with quantum walks. Physical Review A, 82(3), 033429.
  3. Zhu, J. Y., et al. (2017). Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle-consistent adversarial networks. Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision.
  4. Nayak, A., & Vishwanath, A. (2000). Quantum walk on the line. arXiv preprint quant-ph/0010117.
  5. Ambainis, A. (2003). Quantum walks and their algorithmic applications. International Journal of Quantum Information, 1(04), 507-518.
  6. Childs, A. M. (2009). Universal computation by quantum walk. Physical review letters, 102(18), 180501.
  7. Asboth, J. K., & Edge, J. M. (2015). A brief introduction to topological phases of photons. International Journal of Modern Physics B, 29(21), 1530006.